home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Space & Astronomy
/
Space and Astronomy (October 1993).iso
/
mac
/
TEXT
/
SPACEDIG
/
V08
/
V8_246.TXT
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
1991-07-08
|
16KB
From ota Tue Jun 7 03:07:33 1988
Received: by angband.s1.gov id AA08368; Tue, 7 Jun 88 03:07:18 PDT
id AA08368; Tue, 7 Jun 88 03:07:18 PDT
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 88 03:07:18 PDT
From: Ted Anderson <ota>
Message-Id: <8806071007.AA08368@angband.s1.gov>
To: Space@angband.s1.gov
Reply-To: Space@angband.s1.gov
Subject: SPACE Digest V8 #246
SPACE Digest Volume 8 : Issue 246
Today's Topics:
Ad hominum attacks, summary of NSS board
Re: Night launch
Re: Non-sexist language (was:Space Station Names)
Re: Space Station Names :-)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Sun, 15 May 1988 13:47-EDT
From: Dale.Amon@h.gp.cs.cmu.edu
Subject: Ad hominum attacks, summary of NSS board
I will respond once and only once on the personal attacks that I have
seen recently in this magazine. Scott Pace and I are both available to
defend ourselves, some of the others named are not.
Several individuals have been slandered who are not present to defend
themselves. I cannot hope to handle a defense for them, but just so
that these good people do not have their reputations impugned simply
because the thousands of readers out there do not know anything about
them, I will give a brief summary bio:
Sandy Adamson was instrumental in the founding of the Portland L5
chapter. Her background was in anthropology, but her first love was
space colonies. She moved to Tucson and was a major activist with the
Tucson chapter for many years. She became an officer within L5 and
traveled to conferences, both national and regional on her own
resources for many years. And her own resources were based on
freelancing work around Tucson. A major part of her income went into
society activities. She was a major force in political activities in
the society. In 1984 she did a great deal of work and got society
volunteers behind the short lived Glenn campaign.
A few years ago, she went to Washington to help lobby for the space
station funding for L5. She was paid only part time because that was
all that could be afforded, and what was available to pay her came
mostly from individual donations in special fund raisers. She had to
share space in someone else's apartment because she wasn't paid enough
to afford her own place.
To survive she started picking up some small jobs, and was finally
pointed to a consulting position by an old friend. She has for the last
year and half held a real paying job in space policy. She has thus
advanced one more step towards her life dream of living and working in
space after spending 10 years donating her life, her income and just
about her soul to the society. She also finds time to be a very caring
individual.
Mark Hopkins is more controversial in society circles but no one, even
his most avowed 'enemy' (sic) will claim that he is anything less than
one of the initiators of the space movement and one of it's hardest
workers.
Mark was involved with the initial summer study group run by Dr.
O'Neill and along with Eric Drexler (also present at that session) and
some others, was one of the founders of L5. He was working on a Phd in
Economics at Harvard(?) at the time. He took a job at Rand doing
non-space type work. The think-tank type atmosphere gave him the time
to dedicate to the society. Many of us have wondered if he ever
actually did ANY Rand work, or if so whether he'd invented the 30 hour
day. He had not finished his Phd thesis due to society work, and in
fact is only now finishing it, over TEN YEARS late. We once gave his
wife an "ignored spouse" award. It actually wasn't so funny. Mark has
totally dedicated his life to the space movement, and as far as I can
tell has gotten nothing out of it except getting burned out, burned and
maybe a bit paranoid. But he keeps at it, no matter what the personal
cost.
Since our organizational watch word is "I WANT TO GO!!!!!" I would
suggest that most of our more energetic members will eventually work
professionally in some facit of space. We are processing grass roots
activists into professionals committed to the dream. Those
professionals will dominate the government, military and private space
efforts because they CARE. Hardworking activists are going to drive out the
9-5 put-in-40 schleps. If we aren't in it to go ourselves, then why
would any of us be such utter fools as to endanger our careers,
relationships, finances and sanity for the movement? (Last year cost me
nearly a third of my GROSS) I want to go, and I work with other people
who also want to go. Anyone who doesn't had better get out of my way.
I will also note that "aerospace" money does not dominate the
organization. Such monies are received through the AIAC (Aerospace
Industries Association Council), but are used only for special
projects, NOT for operating expenses. This is intentionally done to
keep them at a safe arms length. At least one incident occured in which
they did try to throw some weight. And they got quite a few people very
angry (myself included). I doubt they will try it again soon.
It is easy to attack particular goals of the society. And the larger
the organization grows, the more likely it is that some group will be
dissatisfied. I suggest that the vote on the name change tells us
something about the stand of the average member.
I will also state (having been one of the people who voluntarily worked for
severals days to encode last fall's survey) that a vast majority of the
membership places strong support of the space station in the context of
going for a lunar base and then to Mars. The policy stands of the
organization follow this. I'm personally in favor of Space
Industries/WESPACE, External Tank Company, etc INSTEAD of the station.
But so long as I am a representative of a membership that
feels otherwise, I will bow to their wishes while occasionally pointing
out the alternatives and working to insure they are noticed.
I will also note the copy of the Space Cause voters guide in front of
me has Dukakis as the first entry and gives him nearly a full page. My
candidate, Ron Paul was left out entirely. I expressed my disappointment to
Mr. Pace. Within a week he responded to me with a hardcopy draft on Ron
Paul. Ron will be fairly treated in the next edition.
I can hardly call this non-responsiveness to minority views.
I will not respond furthur on this topic. I will work with anyone who
wants to make the society bigger and better. I will also attempt to
educate people about non-statist viewpoints while not ramming it down
their throats.
And I will ignore the existance of any of the tiny minority who want to
do nothing but bicker over internalities. It is a waste of my time.
SUBJECT CLOSED,
Dale Amon
National Space Society,
Board of Directors
Current Board of Directors:
Dale Amon founder PghL5, chair NE84 regional
conference and 6th national conference.
Michael Collins Apollo 11 astronaut
Tom Doherty New York chapter
K Eric Drexler author Engines of Creation, founding
member of L5, chapter activist in
Massachusetts area a few years back.
Worked on the very first mass driver.
He's the long haired one in the picture
you always see of MD-I with Gerard
O'Neill in front.
Founder of Foresite Institute
Art Dula Chairman of 2nd national conference.
Active in Space Foundation (Space
Business Roundtables). Well known space
lawyer, involved with marketing the
Proton to US customers.
Frederick Durant III (I don't know him well)
Nancy Feldman (Don't know her. Regional board member
from Kansas)
Edward Finch space lawyer, author of Astrobusiness.
Helped carry our fight against the Moon
Treaty to the UN.
Georgia Franklin Housewife, does lectures with hundereds
of schools in Washington state every
year. A tireless activist.
Peter Glaser inventor of the Solar Power Satellite
William Gunn long time activist in South Carolina
chapters.
Joe Hopkins spark plug behind most of the Seattle
chapters. Worked on "glass cockpit' of
767 for Boeing. Chairman of 5th
national conference. Another tireless
worker.
Maxwell Hunter Long time aerospace engineer. Currently
retired and designing single stage to
orbit craft for Society Expeditions.
Margaret Jordon Ran the Astronaut Memorial Foundation
for L5 until the bill died in congress.
Worked with TRW for awhile, currently a
student again. Long time activist in
the OASIS chapter.
Irving Kahn (Don't know him)
George Koopman Activist who is doing something about
it. Was involved with Starstruck water
launch of solid-fuel/liquid oxidizer
test vehicle. President of AMROC, a
compnay he founded to furthur develop
private launch vehicles.
John Logsdon VERY well known space policy and
history expert at George Washington
University. An insider.
Jim Muncy Worked for Newt Gingritch, parleyed
into a job as space policy advisor to
George Keyworth. Left when Keyworth
did. Did some work for Geostar, some
staff work for NSS and SSI. An
absolutely dedicated activist. Not yet
30.
Florence Nelson I know little about her except she
started a town in Arizona and seems to
be a very good person.
Frederick Ordway III Know very little except that he is an
insider.
Warren Overton Was the phone tree chairman until a few
months ago. I believe he founded the
Birmingham Alabama chapter.
Chris Peterson Was a chapter activist when she and
Eric Drexler were in school. Later
became chapters coordinator for L5, the
editor of L5 News, an officer in the
society for a few years.
Ken Poe Kansas chapter activist. Became L5
chapters coordinator after Chris
Peterson.
Gene Roddenberry Star Trek.
Neil Ruzic (Don't know him)
Charles Sheffield SF author. VP of company involved in
remote sensing. Co-chairman of 4th
national conference.
Jill Steele Denver area chapter activist. Chair of
the next national conference (7th)
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
Ben Bova (president) Well known SF author
Gordon Woodcock Long time Boeing employee. Along with
(Chairman of the Joe Hopkins, one of the founders of
Executive Committee) Seattle L5 chapters. Co-chair of 5th
national conference. Was President of
L5 at time of merger. Gives papers on
leading edge space missions, propulsion
ideas, economic justifications,etc.
Arthur Kantrowitz member of National Academy of Science
(Chairman, Board of
Directors)
Hugh Downs Well known broadcaster at ABC netowrk
(Chairman, Board of
Governors)
Gary Oleson Founder of Washington DC chapter.
(Executive Vice Chairman of 4th national conference.
President) Dedicated activist.
Mark Chartrand Former exec director of NSI
(Senior Vice President)
Mark Hopkins A founder of L5, Spacepac, Spacecause
(Vice President) Has been a key figure in L5 society
operations and now NSS operations for
over a decade.
Robert F Allnutt (don't know him)
(Vice President)
Elisa Wynn Dominant force behind Niagara L5 for
(Vice President) many years. Current chapters
coordinator. Working on lots of
committees and traveling to DC at
regular intervals. A housewife with 2
kids.
Leonard David Founder of one of the earliest (and
(Vice President) short lived space organizations) about
15 years back, along with Alan Ladwig.
Past and new editor of Space World. A
'professional' activist for 15 years.
Also a damn fine auto-harp player and
songwriter.
Sandy Adamson Activist with Portland L5, Tucson L5
(Secretary) One of the founders of L5 political
efforts going back to the Moon Treaty
fight. Was society 'paid' lobbyist in
DC during early space stations fights.
Has been officer and board member off
and on for nearly a decade. Currently
working for a beltway bandit.
Harry S Dawson (Don't know him)
(treasurer)
David Brandt Erichsen Was with Sandy Adamson as a Portland L5
(Assistant Secretary) and a Tucson L5 activist. Was a long
time officer of L5.
Ed Gray (don't know him)
(Assistant Treasurer)
S Neil HosenBall (don't know him)
(General Council)
Glen Wilson was involved with NASA educational
(Executive Director) outreach for many years. Has been exec
director of NSI and now NSS. Has put
in loads of his own cash and taken no
salary.
David Webb This guy has done so much for so long
(Chairman of the that I'm almost embarrased to
Legislative Comm.) summarize. He was heavily involved with
UNISPACE 82, was one of our activist
reps on the National Commission on
Space. Has helped on virtually every
national conference. Founded a space
studies program at University of North
Dakota. And on, and on. He's also one
of the nicest people you will ever deal
with. Of course he is Irish...
------------------------------
Date: 15 May 88 16:47:58 GMT
From: sonia!khayo@cs.ucla.edu (Eric Behr)
Subject: Re: Night launch
In article <12260@shemp.CS.UCLA.EDU> khayo@MATH.ucla.edu I wrote:
>I just saw a fabulous sight - most likely a launch from
>VAB. (...)
^^^ sorry for the typo; I'm sure VAFB is a little better
suited for launching things than VAB is 8-)
>I hope to read something about it in tomorrow's paper.
Nothing in the papers, but a one-liner on NPR: it was a Trident
test, launched from a sub off the coast...
Eric
------------------------------
Date: 14 May 88 14:43:59 GMT
From: cfa!cfa250!mcdowell@husc6.harvard.edu (Jonathan McDowell)
Subject: Re: Non-sexist language (was:Space Station Names)
>From article <8738@ames.arc.nasa.gov>, by eugene@pioneer.arpa (Eugene N. Miya):
> They had Uncle Carl Sagan on the Morning Show. K.S. brought to topic
> of Unmanned versus Manned space, and Carl politely noted the sexism in
> the term and moved on the role of the person-ed and un-person-ed space.
> --eugene miya, NASA Ames Research Center, eugene@aurora.arc.nasa.gov
The NCOS report used 'piloted' and 'unpiloted' spaceflight which is
pretty well what I'd settled on as the best term. One can also talk
about 'automatic spacecraft' vs 'spaceships' (the latter being vessels
with humans aboard'. The 'unpiloted' term runs into trouble when we
have robot spaceships with human passengers. Maybe 'Astronautics'
should include everything and 'Spaceflight' should be restricted to
flight involving humans. But I just can't come up with a good
gender-free word to replace exactly the sense of 'manned'! 'Person' is
ugly, and potentially includes non-human intelligences (Martians or
human-made AI) - we need a term which means specifically 'humanned' but
sounds more natural. 'Crewed' is no good (see comment about
passenger-only above), likewise 'staffed' (yuck) which doesnt have the
right sense. Any constructive suggestions?
Jonathan McDowell
Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
------------------------------
Date: 14 May 88 20:35:53 GMT
From: elsie!ado@cvl.umd.edu (Arthur David Olson)
Subject: Re: Space Station Names :-)
> They had Uncle Carl Sagan on the Morning Show. K.S. brought to topic
> of Unmanned versus Manned space, and Carl politely noted the sexism in
> the term and moved on the role of the person-ed and un-person-ed space.
Does this mean advocates of automated exploration will become unpersons?
--
Canada is to spaceflight as the U.S.S.R. is to baseball.
ado@ncifcrf.gov ADO is a trademark of Ampex.
------------------------------
End of SPACE Digest V8 #246
*******************